Lately, it seems like conversation has become a competitive sport in which the end-game is to “win” or have one’s opinion proven right. In order to win we present our airtight cases and debate to convert others to our way of thinking. There is nothing wrong with these influencing tactics but when they become the default and dominant approach, we actually become LESS influential, LESS convincing, and LESS credible. We become… bulldozers.
Too often leaders who want to influence others forget one thing:
People are less open to hearing your point of view until they feel seen, heard, and thus, understood by you.
In our desire to show others the merits (and “brilliance”) of our thinking, we make a number of common errors that come under the category of excessive advocacy. Think about the last political conversation you had with a colleague or friend who thinks differently than you do. If you did any of the following you were probably bulldozing.
* Talking without pausing or asking for the other person’s reaction to what you said
* Framing your opinions and beliefs as facts or “the only possible conclusion”
* Using questions to weaken others’ positions and strengthen your own
* Citing only information that supports your point of view
* Overstating the credentials of the sources you site
* Withholding information that weakens or contradicts your perspective
* Using dismissive or negative language to describe people who disagree with you
* Calling into question the motives, judgment, and intelligence of those who think differently
What’s the impact of using these tactics? The person on the receiving end feels shut down, overwhelmed, and browbeaten. The person you are trying to influence stops listening! But there’s an equally important impact on you. You become seen as someone who lacks curiosity about others’ views. You develop a reputation as someone “too certain about your own certainty.”
To avoid the error of excessive advocacy, I recommend the following three actions:
1. Change your purpose: Instead of going into a conversation with the purpose of winning a debate enter into a conversation with the goal of enriching your understanding of each other’s viewpoints.
2. Balance advocacy with inquiry: Work as hard at genuinely asking about the other person’s views, the reasons for their views, and their reactions to your views as you do at clearly expressing your perspective.
3. Own Your Limitations: Each of us only sees things from where we sit. By definition each of us brings a unique but limited way of seeing to every issue. Adopt as your mantra: “Here’s the way I see things from where I sit…”
Have you ever been on the receiving end of someone who was over-advocating? How did you handle it?
Photo Credit: begemont_dn
Hi Larry, this was such great thought to hear — bottom line advice for those who are passionate about what they do and are trying to move others towards a goal. In one-on-one conversation, sometimes pushing hard is not the best way — listening, hearing, understanding, exploring nuance is the best way to build your credibility.
As you infer Ross, it’s so easy to get caught in our passion and convictions that we run the risk of excessive advocacy. I want my readers to understand that it’s not about denying or repressing your passion and purpose. It’s about channeling your enthusiasm in ways that engage others and enrich your own thinking. I believe that engaging others and showing real receptivity to their perspectives makes us more influential.
Really appreciate these ideas and how you frame them, Larry. Thank you!
Thanks for this feedback Sarah. The work your organization (www.womenwin.org) does to build leadership capacity and life skills in girls around the world is remarkable. I know my readers will want to check it out!
Thanks for the great post and food for thought. i can totally be a bulldozer, I’ll work on it!
Larry.
Good comments.
I have learnt from my mistakes, by articulating my point of view before listening to others.
Listening to others, first is much more productive and can help you frame a response in a more informed manner.
Larry.
Good comments.
I have learnt from my mistakes, by articulating my point of view before listening to others.
Listening to others, first is much more productive and can help you frame a response in a more informed manner.
Thanks Larry – I’m glad you resurfaced this post. I’m going to use this list to identify when I’m bulldozing. Re your question about being on the receiving end: I’ve not handled situations like this very well. My “go to” is to multitask or check-out. What are some tips to gracefully slow down a bulldozer?